Canadian Constitution and Charter of rights and freedoms?
I saw a post on a forum. Can someone tell me if this guy is telling the truth?
"The Canadian "charter of rights and constitution" is nothing. It has no legal bearing or binding in ANY Canadian court. It was never ratified, and it is just a piece of paper to give Canadians a false sense of security.
The law in relation to you is heavily based on the ever so abused "admiralty laws" which treats you like an individual who works on a boat and the government as the captain.
There’s a Canadian guy in Vancouver I forget his name – Robert Maroe – or something like that with a great video. Basically, you’re a "Child of the province".
To compare the false canadian constitution and "bill of rights" to the American is foolish, and you’re in for a surprise if you try to bring some value to these two worthless papers in court.
Canada is not a constitutional republic. When you go to court, it’s not "You vs. The People. It’s "You vs. some ugly "queen"".
Tagged with: Admiralty Laws • bearing • bill of rights • canada • canadian constitution • canadians • charter of rights • constitutional republic • false sense of security • maroe • piece of paper • queen • sense of security • surprise • telling the truth • vancouver
Filed under: Admiralty Laws
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Thats not true. The canadian charter of rights is the foundation of all canadian laws. The queen of england is no more than a figure head and holds no power whatsoever in Canada.