privacy on internet
Philosphy Debate: Internet Privacy – HELP!?

The thesis for the debate is:
“There should be no claim for privacy on the internet.”

I am an opponent in the debate and need to apply ethical theories to reject the premises of the proponents.

The only things I can think to use are a Utilitarian Perspective (Compare the harms and benefits of an action to determine wheter or not the action is morally right or wrong.) and a Kantian Perspective (Never treat people as a means to an end, but as an end in themselves.)

Can anyone think of anything else I can use?

Thanks.
A spelling error in the title, how nice.

Dear Mr. Bungle,
What in the he ll are you talking about?
Try this:
Tell them if they don’t agree with you. You will break their legs…
And you misspelled Philosophy, Nipple Ring Boy…

Internet Privacy

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Tagged with:

Filed under: Sovereign Rights

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!